The County Commission has adopted a
"Neighborhood Casino" ordinance which
distinguishes between a large resort hotel found on the
Las Vegas Boulevard "Strip" and a hotel casino
found off the strip, in neighborhoods around Clark
County.
The Board adopted the ordinance on
January 18, 2006, after appointing an 11-person
stakeholders committee in early 2005 to suggest
regulatory options related to neighborhood casinos. The
ordinance went into effect on February 6, 2006.
The ordinance first establishes a definition for
"Neighborhood Casino" based on geographic area
(outside the urban core and not master planned for
resort hotel) and defines the hotel as having a minimum
of 200 rooms, rather than the 300 room minimum required
for resort hotels.
State law initiated in 1997, along with a local
ordinance adopted in 2000 restrict s resort hotels from
establishing in areas outside of the Las Vegas Boulevard
Gaming Corridor which are not master planned for resort
uses. However, a "major project" development
may designate area for a resort hotel use within their
specific plan. This is the case for four sites within
the County. Typically, with major project development,
all the uses (ie residential, commercial, parks, resort
hotel, etc.) are planned and entitlements are given long
before ground is ever broken to construct the resort
hotel; very often after many residents have moved into
the area without realizing a resort hotel will be
constructed around the corner from their home.
In order to address issues mentioned above, the
ordinance focused on process improvements intended to
increase neighborhood awareness, as follows:
| I. |
At least one sign
shall have a minimum area of 256 square feet. |
| II. |
One sign shall be constructed on each street frontage.
|
| III. |
If available, the information required on each sign
shall include: (a) approved height, (b) casino area, and
(c) number of rooms.
|
Development and design standards for
neighborhood casinos are as follows:
-
The structure is limited to a
maximum height of 100 feet (if it is located within
the Mixed Use Overlay District, the height permitted
within the MUD subdistrict applies).
-
No lighting from any building
shall shine directly on adjacent development.
Reflective lighting (such as but not limited to
backlighting and uplighting) shall be used to the
greatest extent practical.
-
The use of highly reflective
building materials should be minimized to reduce
potential impacts on nearby properties.
-
All existing safe routes to
school and future school sites shall be identified
on the site plan, and related safety concerns shall
be addressed at time of design review.
The Board recognized the potential
impacts such facilities can have on neighbors. While
specific mandates were not codified, the following
issues were included in the ordinance which applicants
are expected to address with their plans and during the
public hearings:
-
Traffic mitigation of potential
traffic impacts.
-
Separation distance from
inventoried (future) and existing school sites
located within 2,500 linear feet of the proposed
project.
-
Height, size, brilliance, and
animation of signs.
-
Access through non-gaming areas
for community recreational uses that invite or
welcome minors.