Election Department
November 5, 1996 General Election Results - Clark County Election Department

Revised 4/7/2005 by Julie Barker

ELECTION RESULTS
 November 5, 1996 General Election 
 
Election Department - Clark County, Nevada  

REGISTRATION AND TURNOUT

Total Registration:  432,581 (active)

Turnout (500 Precincts):

Early Voting:

46,136

10.67%

Election Day Voting:

194,023 44.85%

Mail In Voting:

24,927 5.76%

Total: Turnout:

265,086

61.28%

Star Graphic  Winners are highlighted in yellow with bold text.  Star Graphic

Party Abbreviations

Major Parties:

DEM:  Democrat    

REP:  Republican


Minor Parties:  

GRN:  Green 

IAP:  Independent American

 

LIB: Libertarian

NAT:  Natural Law    

REF:  Reform

Graphic Divider

PRESIDENT / VICE PRESIDENT

Candidate

Party

Graph

Votes

%

Brown / Jorgensen

LIB

Graph Bar

2,480

0.94%

Clinton / Gore

DEM

Graph Bar

127,963

48.71%

Dole / Kemp

REP

Graph Bar

103,431

39.37%

Hagelin / Tompkins

NAT

268

0.10%

Nader / LaDuke

GRN

1,902

0.72%

Perot / Choate

REF

Graph Bar

23,177

8.82%

Phillips / Titus

IAP

834

0.32%

None of the Candidates

Graph Bar

2,655

1.01%

Precincts:  500

Total:

262,710

100.00%

Graphic Divider

Representative in Congress District 1

Candidate

Party

Graph

Votes

%

Coffin, Bob 

DEM

Graph Bar

75,081

43.50%

Dan, James

LIB

Graph Bar

3,341

1.94%

Eidson, Richard 

NAT

Graph Bar

3,127

1.81%

Ensign, John 

REP

Graph Bar

86,472

50.10%

Gunderson, Ted 

IAP

Graph Bar

4,572

2.65%

Precincts:  361

Total:

172,593

100.00%

Representative in Congress District 2

Candidate

Party

Graph

Votes

%

Avery, Lois

NAT

Graph Bar

1,875

2.36%

Gibbons, Jim 

REP

Graph Bar

45,071

56.75%

Hansen, Dan 

IAP

Graph Bar

2,361

2.97%

Tomburello, Louis 

LIB

Graph Bar

1,254

1.58%

Wilson, Thomas "Spike" 

DEM

Graph Bar

28,862

36.34%

Precincts:  139

Total:

79,423

100.00%

Graphic Divider

State Senate district 2

Candidate

Party

Graph

Votes

%

Holtz, Terry 

REP

Graph Bar

8,885

37.44%

Kuntz, Craig 

LIB

Graph Bar

1,193

5.03%

Shaffer, Ray 

DEM

Graph Bar

13,654

57.53%

Precincts:  56

Total:

23,732

100.00%

State Senate district 3

Candidate

Party

Graph

Votes

%

Lowden, Sue 

REP

Graph Bar

9,046

43.53%

Wiener, Valerie 

DEM

Graph Bar

10,871

52.31%

Williams, Janice 

NAT

Graph Bar

863

4.15%

Precincts:  52

Total:

20,780

100.00%

State Senate district 4

Candidate

Party

Graph

Votes

%

Neal, Joe 

DEM

Graph Bar

7,793

73.79%

Wallace, David R. 

REP

Graph Bar

2,768

26.21%

Precincts:  25

Total:

10,561

100.00%

State Senate district 5

Candidate

Party

Graph

Votes

%

Hagen, Tim 

LIB

Graph Bar

2,645

4.65%

O'Connell, Ann 

REP

Graph Bar

28,455

49.99%

Sisolak, Steve 

DEM

Graph Bar

25,817

45.36%

Precincts:  104

Total:

56,917

100.00%

State Senate district 6

Candidate

Party

Graph

Votes

%

Nakamura, Daryl 

DEM

Graph Bar

12,942

39.14%

Rawson, Ray 

REP

Graph Bar

20,122

60.86%

Precincts:  61

Total:

33,064

100.00%

State Senate district 7

Candidate

Party

Graph

Votes

%

Muth, Charles 

REP

Graph Bar

13,085

38.88%

Titus, Dina 

DEM

Graph Bar

20,568

61.12%

Precincts:  74

Total:

33,653

100.00%

State Senate district 8

Candidate

Party

Graph

Votes

%

Cobb, Dennis 

REP

Graph Bar

13,629

41.30%

Schneider, Mike 

DEM

Graph Bar

17,896

54.23%

Sims, Jerry 

LIB

Graph Bar

1,477

4.48%

Precincts:  76

Total:

33,002

100.00%

Graphic Divider

State Assembly district 1

Candidate

Party

Graph

Votes

%

Collins, Tom 

DEM

Graph Bar

6,882

55.54%

Knight, Jeff 

REP

Graph Bar

5,510

44.46%

Precincts:  26

Total:

12,392

100.00%

State Assembly district 2

Candidate

Party

Graph

Votes

%

Berman, Merle 

REP

Graph Bar

6,605

54.85%

Ponticello, John 

DEM

Graph Bar

5,438

45.15%

Precincts:  24

Total:

12,043

100.00%

State Assembly district 3

Candidate

Party

Graph

Votes

%

Brower, Maureen E. 

REP

Graph Bar

3,471

75.37%

Lee, John 

DEM

Graph Bar

4,271

92.75%

Roesberry, Lewis Edward 

LIB

Graph Bar

334

7.25%

Precincts:  20

Total:

4,605

100.00%

State Assembly district 4

Candidate

Party

Graph

Votes

%

Braunlin, Deanna 

REP

Graph Bar

13,807

65.82%

Jenkins, Leroy 

DEM

Graph Bar

7,170

34.18%

Precincts:  37

Total:

20,977

100.00%

State Assembly district 5

Candidate

Party

Graph

Votes

%

Cegavske, Barbara K. 

REP

Graph Bar

6,883

77.46%

O'Neill, Patrick 

LIB

Graph Bar

2,003

22.54%

Precincts:  23

Total:

8,886

100.00%

State Assembly district 6

Candidate

Party

Graph

Votes

%

Southard, Arlene 

REP

Graph Bar

1,526

30.54%

Williams, Wendell P. 

DEM

Graph Bar

3,470

69.46%

Precincts:  14

Total:

4,996

100.00%

State Assembly district 7

Candidate

Party

Graph

Votes

%

Arberry Jr., Morse 

DEM

Graph Bar

4,049

73.54%

Richardson, Chester 

REP

Graph Bar

1,457

26.46%

Precincts:  11

Total:

5,506

100.00%

State Assembly district 8

Candidate

Party

Graph

Votes

%

Buckley, Barbara 

DEM

Graph Bar

4,502

70.49%

Gubler, Devrin R. 

REP

Graph Bar

1,885

29.51%

Precincts:  14

Total:

6,387

100.00%

State Assembly district 9

Candidate

Party

Graph

Votes

%

Giunchigliani, Chris 

DEM

Graph Bar

3,586

63.94%

Lagan, Lili M. 

REP

Graph Bar

2,022

36.06%

Precincts:  16

Total:

5,608

100.00%

State Assembly district 10

Candidate

Party

Graph

Votes

%

Conte, Paul R. 

LIB

Graph Bar

294

5.39%

Goldwater, David 

DEM

Graph Bar

3,384

61.99%

Lance, Bill 

REP

Graph Bar

1,781

32.63%

Precincts:  15

Total:

5,459

100.00%

State Assembly district 11

Candidate

Party

Graph

Votes

%

Bache, Doug 

DEM

Graph Bar

3,264

61.77%

Henchik, Bryan 

REP

Graph Bar

1,739

32.91%

Severance, Earle Brand 

LIB

Graph Bar

281

5.32%

Precincts:  13

Total:

5,284

100.00%

State Assembly district 12

Candidate

Party

Graph

Votes

%

Ohrenschall, Genie 

DEM

Graph Bar

6,035

69.24%

Rader, Art 

REP

Graph Bar

2,681

30.76%

Precincts:  17

Total:

8,716

100.00%

State Assembly district 13

Candidate

Party

Graph

Votes

%

Lowes, John M.

DEM

Graph Bar

6,964

37.19%

Nolan, Dennis 

REP

Graph Bar

11,761

62.81%

Precincts:  35

Total:

18,725

100.00%

State Assembly district 14

Candidate

Party

Graph

Votes

%

Bennett, Max 

REP

Graph Bar

3,016

44.80%

Koivisto, Ellen 

DEM

Graph Bar

3,716

55.20%

Precincts:  16

Total:

6,732

100.00%

State Assembly district 15

Candidate

Party

Graph

Votes

%

Close, Jack D. 

REP

Graph Bar

6,184

64.06%

Seegers, Arno Gunther 

DEM

Graph Bar

3,469

35.94%

Precincts:  23

Total:

9,653

100.00%

State Assembly district 16

Candidate

Party

Graph

Votes

%

Herrera, Dario 

DEM

Graph Bar

4,911

58.08%

Ivanov-Steel, Stefan 

REP

Graph Bar

3,545

41.92%

Precincts:  18

Total:

8,456

100.00%

State Assembly district 17

Candidate

Party

Graph

Votes

%

Dubose, II, Leon 

REP

Graph Bar

2,864

40.04%

Price, Bob 

DEM

Graph Bar

4,288

59.96%

Precincts:  15

Total:

7,152

100.00%

State Assembly district 18

Candidate

Party

Graph

Votes

%

Groenert, Robert W. 

REP

Graph Bar

2,203

27.23%

Manendo, Mark 

DEM

Graph Bar

5,888

72.77%

Precincts:  16

Total:

8,091

100.00%

State Assembly district 19

Candidate

Party

Graph

Votes

%

Hauger, Jon David 

REP

Graph Bar

1,502

29.56%

Krenzer, Sandi 

DEM

Graph Bar

3,580

70.44%

Precincts:  14

Total:

5,082

100.00%

State Assembly district 20

Candidate

Party

Graph

Votes

%

Bridges, Randy 

DEM

Graph Bar

5,696

33.35%

Von Tobel, Kathy 

REP

Graph Bar

11,382

66.65%

Precincts:  30

Total:

17,078

100.00%

State Assembly district 21

Candidate

Party

Graph

Votes

%

Hansen, Christopher 

IAP

Graph Bar

942

5.04%

Kirschner, Fred 

DEM

Graph Bar

7,003

37.46%

Tiffany, Sandra 

REP

Graph Bar

10,749

57.50%

Precincts:  28

Total:

18,694

100.00%

State Assembly district 22

Candidate

Party

Graph

Votes

%

Bletsch, Iris Z. 

REP

Graph Bar

6,927

47.61%

Segerblom, Gene 

DEM

Graph Bar

7,622

52.39%

Precincts:  23

Total:

14,549

100.00%

State Assembly district 23

Candidate

Party

Graph

Votes

%

Born, Jim

REP

Graph Bar

2,990

35.19%

Perkins, Richard

DEM

Graph Bar

5,507

64.81%

Precincts:  18

Total:

8,497

100.00%

State Assembly district 28

Candidate

Party

Graph

Votes

%

Burns, Jim 

LIB

Graph Bar

322

15.91%

Chowning, Vonne S. 

DEM

Graph Bar

1,536

75.89%

Duke, Dicksie 

IAP

Graph Bar

166

8.20%

Precincts:  6

Total:

2,024

100.00%

State Assembly district 41

Candidate

Party

Graph

Votes

%

Dane, Tony 

REP

Graph Bar

1,690

37.34%

Parks, David 

DEM

Graph Bar

2,602

57.49%

Williams, Michael E. 

NAT

Graph Bar

234

5.17%

Precincts:  12

Total:

4,526

100.00%

State Assembly district 42

Candidate

Party

Graph

Votes

%

Denning, Chris J. 

REP

Graph Bar

2,966

45.69%

Mortenson, Harry 

DEM

Graph Bar

3,281

50.54%

Nash, Calvin 

LIB

Graph Bar

245

3.77%

Precincts:  16

Total:

6,492

100.00%

Graphic Divider

County Commission district A

Candidate

Party

Graph

Votes

%

Haynes, Lee Wayne 

IAP

Graph Bar

9,844

19.19%

Woodbury, Bruce 

REP

Graph Bar

41,461

80.81%

Precincts:  94

Total:

51,305

100.00%

County Commission district b

Candidate

Party

Graph

Votes

%

Davis, Gary J. 

REP

Graph Bar

10,827

36.37%

Kincaid, Mary J. 

DEM

Graph Bar

18,942

63.63%

Precincts:  68

Total:

29,769

100.00%

County Commission district C

Candidate

Party

Graph

Votes

%

Christensen, Paul 

DEM

Graph Bar

25,534

45.52%

Malone, Lance 

REP

Graph Bar

27,820

49.59%

Rousseau, Jeff 

LIB

Graph Bar

2,743

4.89%

Precincts:  102

Total:

56,097

100.00%

County Commission district D

Candidate

Party

Graph

Votes

%

Atkinson-Gates, Yvonne

DEM

Graph Bar

12,334

78.61%

Swift, Earl 

REP

Graph Bar

3,356

21.39%

Precincts:  36

Total:

15,690

100.00%

Graphic Divider

Constable, BOULDER TOWNSHIP

Candidate

Party

Graph

Votes

%

Markotay, Larry L.                      

    REP    

Graph Bar

4,318

100.00%

Precincts:  11

Total:

4,318

100.00%

Constable, las vegas TOWNSHIP

Candidate

Party

Graph

Votes

%

Carns, William 

REP

Graph Bar

76,352

43.62%

Nolen, Bob 

DEM

Graph Bar

98,701

56.38%

Precincts:  393

Total:

175,053

100.00%

Graphic Divider

Justice of the Supreme Court, seat B

Candidate

Graph

Votes

%

Hall, Kenneth L. 

Graph Bar

47,403

21.41%

Maupin, Bill 

Graph Bar

133,089

60.11%

None of these Candidates

Graph Bar

40,901

18.47%

Precincts:  500

Total:

221,393

100.00%

Justice of the Supreme Court, seat D

Candidate

Graph

Votes

%

Jones, Steve 

Graph Bar

91,251

40.13%

Young, Cliff 

Graph Bar

93,002

40.90%

None of these Candidates

Graph Bar

43,141

18.97%

Precincts:  500

Total:

227,394

100.00%

Graphic Divider

District Court Judge, DEPARTMENT 1

Candidate

Graph

Votes

%

Porter, Gene T. 

Graph Bar

169,146

100.00%

Precincts:  500

Total:

169,146

100.00%

District Court Judge, DEPARTMENT 2

Candidate

Graph

Votes

%

Becker, Nancy 

Graph Bar

178,880

100.00%

Precincts:  500

Total:

178,880

100.00%

District Court Judge, DEPARTMENT 3

Candidate

Graph

Votes

%

Pavlikowski, Joe 

Graph Bar

168,300

100.00%

Precincts:  500

Total:

168,300

100.00%

District Court Judge, DEPARTMENT 4

Candidate

Graph

Votes

%

Hardcastle, Kathy A. 

Graph Bar

116,719

56.05%

Leen, Thomas L. 

Graph Bar

91,516

43.95%

Precincts:  500

Total:

208,235

100.00%

District Court Judge, DEPARTMENT 5

Candidate

Graph

Votes

%

Sobel, Jeffrey D. 

Graph Bar

167,105

100.00%

Precincts:  500

Total:

167,105

100.00%

District Court Judge, DEPARTMENT 6

Candidate

Graph

Votes

%

Bonaventure, Joseph T. 

Graph Bar

165,693

100.00%

Precincts:  500

Total:

165,693

100.00%

District Court Judge, DEPARTMENT 7

Candidate

Graph

Votes

%

Gibbons, Mark 

Graph Bar

110,441

51.84%

Vega, Valorie 

Graph Bar

102,610

48.16%

Precincts:  500

Total:

213,051

100.00%

District Court Judge, DEPARTMENT 8

Candidate

Graph

Votes

%

Gates, Lee 

Graph Bar

146,550

70.68%

Hastings, Martin 

Graph Bar

60,796

29.32%

Precincts:  500

Total:

207,346

100.00%

District Court Judge, DEPARTMENT 9

Candidate

Graph

Votes

%

Huffaker, Stephen 

Graph Bar

131,465

65.32%

Ungaro, Laura 

Graph Bar

69,804

34.68%

Precincts:  500

Total:

201,269

100.00%

District Court Judge, DEPARTMENT 10

Candidate

Graph

Votes

%

Lehman, Jack 

Graph Bar

166,717

100.00%

Precincts:  500

Total:

166,717

100.00%

District Court Judge, DEPARTMENT 11

Candidate

Graph

Votes

%

Cory, Ken 

Graph Bar

91,662

47.55%

Douglas, Michael L. 

Graph Bar

101,107

52.45%

Precincts:  500

Total:

192,769

100.00%

District Court Judge, DEPARTMENT 12

Candidate

Graph

Votes

%

Leavitt, Myron 

Graph Bar

172,645

100.00%

Precincts:  500

Total:

172,645

100.00%

District Court Judge, DEPARTMENT 13

Candidate

Graph

Votes

%

Chairez, Don 

Graph Bar

167,364

100.00%

Precincts:  500

Total:

167,364

100.00%

District Court Judge, DEPARTMENT 14

Candidate

Graph

Votes

%

Flangas, Peter L. 

Graph Bar

56,602

27.86%

Mosley, Donald M. 

Graph Bar

146,579

72.14%

Precincts:  500

Total:

203,181

100.00%

District Court Judge, DEPARTMENT 15

Candidate

Graph

Votes

%

Loeher, Sally 

Graph Bar

147,667

72.35%

Miller, Victor Lee 

Graph Bar

56,420

27.65%

Precincts:  500

Total:

204,087

100.00%

District Court Judge, DEPARTMENT 16

Candidate

Graph

Votes

%

McGroaty, John S. 

Graph Bar

168,746

100.00%

Precincts:  500

Total:

168,746

100.00%

Graphic Divider

District Court Judge, family division, Dept.  G

Candidate

Graph

Votes

%

Guzman, Fernando 

Graph Bar

80,053

45.14%

Steel, Cynthia "Diane" 

Graph Bar

97,281

54.86%

Precincts:  500

Total:

177,334

100.00%

District Court Judge, family division, Dept.  H

Candidate

Graph

Votes

%

Bird, Kendal Sue 

Graph Bar

79,434

45.93%

Redmon, Gary 

Graph Bar

93,509

54.07%

Precincts:  500

Total:

172,943

100.00%

Graphic Divider

State Board of Education, subdistrict A

Candidate

Graph

Votes

%

Hickey, Liliam 

Graph Bar

6,554

53.19%

Washington, Marcia L. 

Graph Bar

5,769

46.81%

Precincts:  39

Total:

12,323

100.00%

State Board of Education, subdistrict D

Candidate

Graph

Votes

%

Husted, Donna 

Graph Bar

29,589

100.00%

Precincts:  84

Total:

29,589

100.00%

State Board of Education, subdistrict F

Candidate

Graph

Votes

%

Hanlon, William 

Graph Bar

21,011

100.00%

Precincts:  71

Total:

21,011

100.00%

State Board of Education, subdistrict G

Candidate

Graph

Votes

%

Garcia-Cahlan, Terry 

Graph Bar

17,038

40.42%

Mathews, Frank M. 

Graph Bar

25,112

59.58%

Precincts:  106

Total:

42,150

100.00%

Graphic Divider

REGENT, STATE UNIVERSITY, subdistrict b

Candidate

Graph

Votes

%

Wiesner, Tom 

Graph Bar

17,896

100.00%

Precincts:  73

Total:

17,896

100.00%

REGENT, STATE UNIVERSITY, subdistrict E

Candidate

Graph

Votes

%

Dondero, Thalia 

Graph Bar

12,168

100.00%

Precincts:  51

Total:

12,168

100.00%

Graphic Divider

Clark County School District A

Candidate

Graph

Votes

%

Kimball, Cynthia 

Graph Bar

15,909

43.21%

Scow, Mary Beth 

Graph Bar

20,913

56.79%

Precincts:  84

Total:

36,822

100.00%

Clark County School District B

Candidate

Graph

Votes

%

Chow, Eleanor K. 

Graph Bar

10,874

46.60%

Johnson, Ruth 

Graph Bar

12,461

53.40%

Precincts:  65

Total:

23,335

100.00%

Clark County School District C

Candidate

Graph

Votes

%

Barber, Shirley 

Graph Bar

9,688

61.51%

McMillan, James B. 

Graph Bar

6,063

38.49%

Precincts:  48

Total:

15,751

100.00%

Clark County School District E

Candidate

Graph

Votes

%

Hutchison, Mark A. 

Graph Bar

18,260

39.79%

Tarkanian, Lois 

Graph Bar

27,627

60.21%

Precincts:  110

Total:

45,887

100.00%

Graphic Divider

Moapa Valley Water District, logandale

Candidate

Graph

Votes

%

Cottam, Arnold T. 

Graph Bar

514

80.31%

Porter, Vicki T. 

Graph Bar

126

19.69%

Precincts:  2

Total:

640

100.00%

Moapa Valley Water District, MOAPA-GLENDALE

Candidate

Graph

Votes

%

Kellar, Clarence 

Graph Bar

57

25.91%

Lewis, Bob 

Graph Bar

163

74.09%

Precincts:  1

Total:

220

100.00%

Moapa Valley Water District, OVERTON

Candidate

Graph

Votes

%

Cooper, Ivan 

Graph Bar

428

53.50%

Staton, Ken 

Graph Bar

372

46.50%

Precincts:  1

Total:

800

100.00%

Graphic Divider

Overton Power District 1

Candidate

Graph

Votes

%

Aston, Mark 

Graph Bar

430

52.63%

Payne, Cal 

Graph Bar

387

47.37%

Precincts:  1

Total:

817

100.00%

Graphic Divider

Justice of the Peace, HENDERSON township, DEPARTMENT 2

Candidate

Graph

Votes

%

Beauchamp, Robertson C. 

Graph Bar

7,345

30.32%

Dawson, Kent J. 

Graph Bar

16,877

69.68%

Precincts:  54

Total:

24,222

100.00%

Graphic Divider

Question 1
Amendment to the Constitution:  Public Employees Retirement System

Shall the Nevada Constitution be amended to place additional restrictions on the use of money paid to fund and administer the Public Employees' Retirement System and to establish and prescribe the duties of the governing board for that system?

Choice

Graph

Votes

%

Yes

Graph Bar

178,461

73.81%

No

Graph Bar

63,307

26.19%

Precincts:  500

Total:

241,768

100.00%

Question 2
Amendment to the Constitution: Rights of Victims of Crime

Shall the Nevada Constitution be amended to provide specifically for the rights of victims of crime?

Choice

Graph

Votes

%

Yes

Graph Bar

1,838,890

96.86%

No

Graph Bar

59,535

3.14%

Precincts:  500

Total:

1,898,425

100.00%

Question 3
Amendment to the Constitution: Recall Signatures

Shall the Nevada Constitution be amended to revise the method of determining the number of signatures required on a petition for the recall of a public officer and to provide additional time to hold a special election on a recall petition?

Choice

Graph

Votes

%

Yes

Graph Bar

140,662

59.37%

No

Graph Bar

96,271

40.63%

Precincts:  500

Total:

236,933

100.00%

Question 4
Amendment to the Ordinance of the Nevada Constitution: Public Lands

Shall the Territorial Ordinance of the Nevada Constitution be amended to remove the disclaimer of the state's interest in the unappropriated public lands?

Choice

Graph

Votes

%

Yes

Graph Bar

132,343

56.90%

No

Graph Bar

100,236

43.10%

Precincts:  500

Total:

232,579

100.00%

Question 5
Amendment to the Constitution: Legislative Review

Shall the Nevada Constitution be amended to authorize the legislative review of regulations of state agencies?

Choice

Graph

Votes

%

Yes

Graph Bar

143,528

61.51%

No

Graph Bar

89,824

38.49%

Precincts:  500

Total:

233,352

100.00%

Question 6
Amendment to the Constitution: Energy Use

Shall the Nevada Constitution be amended to clarify that an exemption from the state's debt limitation also applies to money borrowed to retrofit state buildings to make more efficient use of energy in those buildings?

Choice

Graph

Votes

%

Yes

Graph Bar

100,000

42.94%

No

Graph Bar

132,880

57.06%

Precincts:  500

Total:

232,880

100.00%

Question 7
Amendment to the Constitution: Economic Development

Shall the Nevada Constitution be amended to allow the prudent investment of state money in a company, association, or corporation to stimulate economic development or the creation of new jobs?

Choice

Graph

Votes

%

Yes

Graph Bar

80,469

34.05%

No

Graph Bar

155,888

65.95%

Precincts:  500

Total:

236,357

100.00%

Question 8
Initiative: Term Limits for Federal Offices
Removed from the ballot following U.S. Supreme Court decision

Question 9

Initiative 9(a): Term Limits for State and Local Legislative Offices

Shall the Nevada Constitution be amended to establish term limits for state and local public officers in the executive and legislative branches of government?

Choice

Graph

Votes

%

Yes

Graph Bar

142,792

59.50%

No

Graph Bar

97,211

40.50%

Precincts:  500

Total:

240,003

100.00%

Initiative 9(b): Term Limits for State and Local Judicial Offices

Shall the Nevada Constitution be amended to establish term limits for Nevada justices and judges?

Choice

Graph

Votes

%

Yes

Graph Bar

98,812

47.95%

No

Graph Bar

107,282

52.05%

Precincts:  500

Total:

206,094

100.00%

Question 10
Initiative: Campaign Contributions

Shall the Nevada Constitution be amended to add a new section which establishes, limits and defines campaign contributions?

Choice

Graph

Votes

%

Yes

Graph Bar

171,644

72.61%

No

Graph Bar

64,752

27.39%

Precincts:  500

Total:

236,396

100.00%

Question 11
Initiative: Tax Restraint

Shall the Nevada Constitution be amended to establish a requirement that a two-thirds vote of both houses of the legislature be necessary to pass a measure which generates or increases a tax, fee, assessment, rate or any other form of public revenue?

Choice

Graph

Votes

%

Yes

Graph Bar

168,719

70.42%

No

Graph Bar

70,885

29.58%

Precincts:  500

Total:

239,604

100.00%

Question 12
Bond: Lake Tahoe Basin

Shall the State of Nevada issue general obligation bonds in an amount of not more than $20,000,000 to carry out projects for the control of erosion and the restoration of natural watercourses in the Lake Tahoe Basin?

Choice

Graph

Votes

%

Yes

Graph Bar

124,991

52.68%

No

Graph Bar

112,293

47.32%

Precincts:  500

Total:

237,284

100.00%

Question 13
Tax Act: Exempt Orthotic Appliances

Shall an exemption from the sales and use taxes be provided or orthotic, appliances, ambulatory casts, other supports, splints, bandages, pads, compresses and dressings if prescribed, applied, furnished or sold under certain circumstances?

Choice

Graph

Votes

%

Yes

Graph Bar

154,515

65.20%

No

Graph Bar

82,485

34.80%

Precincts:  500

Total:

237,000

100.00%

Question 14
Tax Act: Exempt Nonprofit Organizations

Shall an exemption from the sales and use taxes be provided for items sold by nonprofit organizations created for religious, charitable, or educational purposes based on standards adopted by the Legislature?

Choice

Graph

Votes

%

Yes

Graph Bar

130,578

54.58%

No

Graph Bar

108,682

45.42%

Precincts:  500

Total:

239,260

100.00%

Question 15
Tax Act: Exempt Air Carriers

Shall the existing exemption from the sales and use taxes for aircraft purchased or used by commercial air carriers based in Nevada and major components of those aircraft be expanded: 1) To apply to purchases or used by commercial air carriers based in other states; and, 2) To include machinery, tools and equipment used to repair, remodel or maintain certain aircraft, aircraft engines or component parts of aircraft or aircraft engines?

Choice

Graph

Votes

%

Yes

Graph Bar

74,919

32.15%

No

Graph Bar

158,090

67.85%

Precincts:  500

Total:

233,009

100.00%

Question 16
Amendment to State Law: Bill Approval

Shall a bill that imposes or increases a tax or assessment be considered and approved twice for final passage by each house of the Nevada Legislature before such a bill may be enacted?

Choice

Graph

Votes

%

Yes

Graph Bar

146,666

62.22%

No

Graph Bar

89,066

37.78%

Precincts:  500

Total:

235,732

100.00%

Question 17
Initiative: Term Limits - Congress

Shall the Nevada Constitution be amended to instruct Nevada's Congressional delegation and member of the State Legislature to provide for term limits for members of the U.S. House of Representatives and the U.S. Senate through action of the Congress or through a Constitutional Convention, and shall the Nevada Constitution be further amended to inform voters how their elected representatives have acted in regard to this issue?

Choice

Graph

Votes

%

Yes

Graph Bar

135,750

57.07%

No

Graph Bar

102,130

42.93%

Precincts:  500

Total:

237,880

100.00%

Question 18
Clark County Bond: School District

Shall Clark County School District be authorized to issue $642.7 million of general obligation bonds to build a total of 16 new schools and to expand, improve, or purchase new equipment for 186 existing schools?

Choice

Graph

Votes

%

Yes

Graph Bar

151,828

60.63%

No

Graph Bar

98,601

39.37%

Precincts:  500

Total:

250,429

100.00%

Unincorporated Clark County Question 19
Property Tax Increase: Police Manpower, Unincorporated Clark County

Shall the County of Clark be authorized to levy an additional ad valorem property tax within, the unincorporated areas of Clark County to be used solely for the purpose of funding the hiring of additional police officers for the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department? If approved, the initial proposed ad valorem rate will be $.0276 per $100 assessed value for FY 1997-98. This initial rate is based upon the County of Clark's responsibility to fund the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department as set forth in Chapter 280 of the Nevada Revised Statutes. This proposed rate will be increased in each of the four following years as additional Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department officers are hired under this assessment. Based upon the current statutory formula and assessed valuation, the tax rate will be $.1549 per $100 assessed valuation in each year beginning in FY2001/2002. This additional ad valorem rate may change in future years based on changes in the statutory formula for the County's obligation to fund the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department and/or changes in the assessed valuation of taxable property in the unincorporated areas of the County of Clark. Regardless of the formula or assessed valuation, this rate may not exceed $.20 per $100 assessed valuation.

Choice

Graph

Votes

%

Yes

Graph Bar

61,742

62.93%

No

Graph Bar

36,366

37.07%

Precincts:  224

Total:

98,108

100.00%

City of Las Vegas Question 19
Property Tax Increase: Police Manpower, City of Las Vegas

Shall the City of Las Vegas be authorized to levy an additional ad valorem property tax within, the incorporated areas of the City of Las Vegas to be used solely for the purpose of funding the hiring of additional police officers for the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department? If approved, the initial proposed ad valorem rate will be $.0356 per $100 assessed value for FY 1997-98. This initial rate is based upon the City of Las Vegas' responsibility to fund the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department as set forth in Chapter 280 of the Nevada Revised Statutes. This proposed rate will be increased in each of the four following years as additional Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department officers are hired under this assessment. Based upon the current statutory formula and assessed valuation, the tax rate will be $.1999 per $100 assessed valuation in each year beginning in FY2001/2002. This additional ad valorem rate may change in future years based on changes in the statutory formula for the City's obligation to fund the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department and/or changes in the assessed valuation of taxable property in the City of Las Vegas. Regardless of the formula or assessed valuation, this rate may not exceed $.20 per $100 assessed valuation.

Choice

Graph

Votes

%

Yes

Graph Bar

56,276

63.55%

No

Graph Bar

32,275

36.45%

Precincts:  186

Total:

88,551

100.00%

City of Las Vegas Question 20
Property Tax Reduction

Shall the city of Las Vegas be authorized to seek a reduction in property tax rates for all City of Las Vegas residents to the level of all the residents of unincorporated Clark County towns, which reduction is to be achieved through the creation of a single gaming taxation district for all Clark County gaming licenses, taxes and fees from all Clark County resort hotels and casinos wherever situated and through all appropriate efficiencies achievable through the consolidated delivery of city and county services?

Choice

Graph

Votes

%

Yes

Graph Bar

70,701

82.29%

No

Graph Bar

15,217

17.71%

Precincts:  186

Total:

85,918

100.00%

City of North Las Vegas Question 19
Public Safety Tax

Shall the City of North Las Vegas be authorized to levy, for a period of 30 years, a tax of $.20 per $100 of assessed valuation for the purpose of implementing the Safe Streets 2000 Program, a multi-year crime-fighting action plan, by hiring additional police and detention officer, support personnel, and providing for equipment and other expenses for the Police Department and City Detention Center? (This question is estimated to raise $2,231,000 annually based on current assessed valuation.)

Choice

Graph

Votes

%

Yes

Graph Bar

7,640

62.03%

No

Graph Bar

4,676

37.97%

Precincts:  25

Total:

12,316

100.00%

Boulder City Question 19
City Charter Revision: Election of Mayor

Should the Boulder City Charter be amended to provide for the direct election of the Mayor?

Choice

Graph

Votes

%

Yes

Graph Bar

4,102

69.06%

No

Graph Bar

1,838

30.94%

Precincts:  11

Total:

5,940

100.00%

Boulder City Question 20
Municipal Code: Repeal and Replace Chapter 41, Title 11

Should the Ordinance relating to the Dwelling and Hotel-Motel Development Control Plan, Chapter 41, Title 11 of the Boulder City Municipal Code be repealed in its entirety and restated and replaced by an ordinance relating to a Controlled Growth Management Plan as Chapter 41, Title 11 of the Boulder City Municipal Code?

Choice

Graph

Votes

%

Yes

Graph Bar

4,051

69.63%

No

Graph Bar

1,767

30.37%

Precincts:  11

Total:

5,818

100.00%

Boulder City Question 21
Capital Improvement Fund: Expand Adams Blvd.

Should the City be authorized to spend from the Capital Improvement Fund up to $4,025,000, when available, to extend Adams Blvd. To Georgia Avenue, construct Georgia Avenue from Nevada Highway to Adams Blvd., including intersection improvements, extend Gingerwood Street and Aspen Drive to Adams Blvd., construct 1/2 of the street of Gingerwood Parkway from Buchanan Blvd. to Bristlecone Drive and construct a proportionate share of Bristlecone Drive from Gingerwood Parkway to Adams Blvd.?

Choice

Graph

Votes

%

Yes

Graph Bar

2,203

37.87%

No

Graph Bar

3,614

62.13%

Precincts:  11

Total:

5,817

100.00%

Boulder City Question 22
Capital Improvement Fund: Street Improvements

Should the City be authorized to spend from the Capital Improvement Fund up to $1,000,000, when available, for street improvements and rehabilitation?

Choice

Graph

Votes

%

Yes

Graph Bar

3,683

62.83%

No

Graph Bar

2,179

37.17%

Precincts:  11

Total:

5,862

100.00%

  

Spacer

Return to Home